Lets keep cutting right down to basics - becuase these are issues which we can get _right_ or stuff up BAD. At 2:59 PM 9/12/96, George Michaelson wrote: >Cutting to the chase Geoff, are you not *INVITING* government to step in >and make DNS delegation a matter of government policy fiat which will exclude >non-government oversight? cutting right down, yes I am inviting their active involvement. I am not so sure that such an involvement would result in the outcome you describe here (and the issue of goverment "blessing" of "industry self regulation" appears to be a feature of the current government drafts of their proposed regulation of what they term "electronic addresses", so there is certainly a somewhat different model which appears to be circulating in the realms of formulating public policy at present). But my REAL BASIC question is What are we building here? A PUBLIC facility which will underpin the communications infrastructure for the remainder of our lives and certainly span those of our children? Or are we mucking about? >I have grave fears for the overall process if thats all that eventuates. I >think you *MUST* float a model which includes and invites government >participation alongside other agencies, in an international context: After >all, the ISO 2-letter delegation doesn't come from the queen... We are talking about a national public resource. I personally want it to be an efficient and efective component of the public Internet. And as a collorary I suppose that this implies that I want the active and informed involvement of public administation (yes I realise that this may be regarded as an oxymoronic description of the public process in this area of activity by some, but if the ASC can get it about right with company names can't we do it here as well?). But what the hell - I may have it all wrong! Have you an alternative model which avoids the impost of domain name applicants avoiding paying their share of the domain administrator's legal defense fund? GeoffReceived on Mon Dec 09 1996 - 19:10:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:02 UTC