Adam,

My apologies for my misunderstanding.

BTW, it does re-inforce my position re trademarks, that no entity
has full rights over a name, and all the smoke coming from
trademark owners re the DNS is mostly just that - smoke.

Regards, Mark




Adam Todd <at&#167;ah.net> on 01/04/98 18:39:24

Please respond to dns&#167;iia.net.au

To:   dns&#167;iia.net.au
cc:    (bcc: Mark Hughes/AUS/ANZ/CCA)
Subject:  Re: DNS: Re: Top ten issues for EC Summit in Canberra




>>Now, does this mean that MIT want CCA to share their resources as well?
>>What baout other enterants?  What is involved for them?  Does DOT AUS Pty
>>Ltd have to include MIT and CCA in the registrations of AUS names?
>
>I don't understand the reference to CCA, as CCA has no involvement and
>is not a Registrar.
Mark, think carefully.
The Internet Indusrty knows CCA to mean "Connect Com Australia"  Not
CocaCola Amatil.
I hope this isn't more dillusions of grandure?