Re: DNS: defining "official" domains

Re: DNS: defining "official" domains

From: Leni Mayo <leni§>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 1998 11:39:07 +1000
Rick Welykochy wrote:

> On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, Leni Mayo wrote:
> > Rick points out that no fees need to be paid to renew the domain.
> Hmmm ... I don't recall pointing that out.

I think there's a terminology issue here, perhaps I'm the one that has
it wrong.  The point is that some domains don't need fees paid in
order to keep them in existence: .com,, .au.  Of course, their
*subdomains* attract fees.

Received on Fri Jun 19 1998 - 12:44:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:03 UTC