Re: [DNS] 92 million reasons......

Re: [DNS] 92 million reasons......

From: Larry Bloch <larry§>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 1999 10:23:53 +1100
At 23:18 2/11/1999 +1100, you wrote:
>] Obvious questions for AUDA and KRE are:
>] 1)Will any NEW INA be obliged to hand over anything?
>People who have been on this list at least 2 years may remember
>that Melbourne IT was given a *non-exclusive* license in

David, you have to consider that the granting of another licence will have 
no effect if access to the zone is not included. kre can remove 
delegation of that zone from MIT, but cannot capture the existing zone and 
customer billing information without INA's cooperation.

So without INA, either Australia loses its 100K+ Names or the status quo 

>] 6)What safeguards have been put in place to ensure the whois database is
>] freely accessible and available to auda and it's members?
>Melbourne IT doesn't have control of whois, and never has.
>  David Keegel <djk&#167;>  URL:
>Cybersource P/L: Unix Systems Administration and TCP/IP network management
>This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without
>express permission of the author.  You don't know who really wrote it.
>261 subscribers. Archived at (dns/dns)
>Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request&#167; to be removed.
Received on Wed Nov 03 1999 - 08:20:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:03 UTC