RE: [DNS] re-delegation of .au

RE: [DNS] re-delegation of .au

From: Paul Day <bonfire§>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 17:14:10 +0800 (WST)
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Rowe, Joshua wrote:

> Mark,
> Individuals can use or if you believe there should be a
> new 2LD for individuals why not make a submission to the Name Policy
> Advisory Panel on their Public Discussion Paper on New 2LDs.

I think there's nothing wrong with the current selection of .au 2LDs
(flame-proof underpants now on) - just some policy issues.

There is something to catch everyone who wants a domain, right through to
the individual who can register a free

One argument from people who dis-like is that they have to register
a sub-domain of a 2LD of However, I doubt any one single person
would be happy to volunteer their time to look after all of if it
was a free-for-all for 2LDs, and no commercial organisation is going to be
happy looking after it unless's atracted a registration cahrge.

By splitting up into it's nine sub-domains, you're splitting the
work up into managable chunks that can be assigned off to volunteers and
hence kept free (for the majority of them).

(and I doubt this policy will change while kre looks after and .au)


Paul Day         Email: bonfire&#167;         Web:
Received on Wed Jun 06 2001 - 17:14:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:04 UTC