Chris, thanks.  My point still is that an auction process, during which the
domain name applicant pays a (possibly substantial) sum of money - certainly
well in excess of a simple registration fee - immediately bestows a value on
that name.

In one of my earlier posts I raised the issue of the potential that a
registrant may inadvertently or as a result of policy change be penalised,
by losing use of a domain name that has acquired a value in the market
place.

In general terms the response was that a domain name as such has no value.

My difficulty remains.  Apparently to support the right of auDA to
"confiscate" a domain name, it is deemed to have no intrinsic value.  Yet on
the other hand, to support auDA's right to auction a name to the highest
bidder, it is deemed instead to have a value.

Ron Stark

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Disspain [mailto:ceo§auda.org.au]
Sent: Tuesday, 18 December 2001 1:45 PM
To: dns§lists.auda.org.au
Subject: RE: [DNS] Notional value of a domain name


It is a fundamental tenet of domain name policy world wide that registrants
only obtain a licence to use the domain name and do not 'own' the name.
Licence periods vary from country to country. In almost all cases, renewal
of the licence is 'automatic' provided that the renewing registrant still
complies with the policy. At the gtld level there is no 'policy' to speak of
but registrants still need to renew the name at the end of the licence
period otherwise the name is available to others to register.

In Australia there are various eligibility rules that apply to second level
domain names. It is only in the event that a registrant is no longer
eligible that they would be unable to re-licence the name. This has always
been the case.

Regards,

Chris Disspain
CEO - auDA
ceo§auda.org.au
+61-3-9349-4711
www.auda.org.au


-----Original Message-----
From: Neale Banks [mailto:neale§lowendale.com.au]
Sent: Tuesday, 18 December 2001 13:11
To: dns§lists.auda.org.au
Subject: Re: [DNS] Notional value of a domain name

On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Ron Stark wrote:

> This is an open question, because I don't have an answer.
>
> If a domain name has no intrinsic value as it's merely a temporary license
> for use, how then can names be auctioned to the highest bidder, on the
> premise that they indeed have value?
>
> I have trouble reconciling these opposing positions.

"IANAL" - but I'd be tempted to guess that it's not the name which is
being auctioned but rather the "temporary license for use" (or whatever
you'd like to call it).

So the (likely) tenure of the license would presumably be a significant
influence on the price.

Regards,
Neale.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
author, further information at the above URL.  (327 subscribers.)



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the 
author, further information at the above URL.  (327 subscribers.)