RE: [DNS] When will auDA take responsibility ?

RE: [DNS] When will auDA take responsibility ?

From: Ginger FISH <ginger-fish§scifi-art.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 23:03:28 +1000
Jon, it's nice to know that with attitudes like yours this industry is a
joke.

BTW: By your own admission you dragged enough data out of melbourne it when
you left to last you a lifetime should you ever decide to become an infamous
scammer or venture into blackmail.

Watch your mouth Jon.

Ginger

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Lawrence [mailto:jon&#167;jonlawrence.com]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 10:56 PM
To: dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au
Subject: RE: [DNS] When will auDA take responsibility ?


I rest easy knowing you're going to save us all, cyrille...


>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au
>From: "Ginger Fish" <ginger-fish&#167;scifi-art.com>
>To: <dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au>
>Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 22:24:04 +1000
>Subject: RE: [DNS] When will auDA take responsibility ?
>
>
>Jon,
>
>>If you really think legislation is the answer then why are you wasting
your
>>time on this mailing list instead of lobbying appropriate politicians?
>
>It's on the way.
>Watch this space.
>
>Ginger
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jon Lawrence [mailto:jon&#167;jonlawrence.com]
>Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 10:25 PM
>To: dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au
>Subject: RE: [DNS] When will auDA take responsibility ?
>
>
>Hey Cyrille
>
>If you really think legislation is the answer then why are you wasting
your
>time on this mailing list instead of lobbying appropriate politicians?
>
>And exactly what legislation are you proposing?
>
>rgds
>jon
>
>
>>-- Original Message --
>>Reply-To: dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au
>>From: "Ginger Fish" <ginger-fish&#167;scifi-art.com>
>>To: <dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au>
>>Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 21:39:43 +1000
>>Subject: [DNS] When will auDA take responsibility ?
>>
>>
>>ACCC & ING..... Until the eleventh hour ING were still an "Accredited
>>Registrar".
>>Correct me if i'm wrong, but shouldn't auDA at least "attempt" to protect
>>Australian consumers?
>>The state of .au administration is nothing short of baffling. The COC
>>Committee, nothing short of a farce.
>>
>>Rod Keys of DDNS on the COC Committee whilst sending out deceptive
>>unsolicited renewal notices to .au registrants.
>>
>>NetRegistry (After ripping off the entire aunic database) have a
>>representative on the COC Committee.
>>
>>Peter Dean, auDA Director, continues to promote ways "around" the .com.au
>>allocation policy on his website www.aunic.com.au and continues to promote
>>"popular generic domains" such as  ".com-au.net"
>>
>>Internet Registrations Australia continue on their merry way.
>>
>>It's got to be a boys club Dave, short of saying it's a useless
>>administration, there's no other explanation.
>>
>>Australian domain name administration is a joke.  The sad thing is
>>Australian consumers continuously keep getting burnt.
>>
>>Is this "self regulation" at it's best?  If it is it clearly isn't
working,
>>certainly not for the benefit of the average Australian consumer.
>>
>>Wake up and smell the roses auDA. A self regulated industry/admin
>harbouring
>>scammers?  Why of course - this is the au administration after all. One
>>would expect no less.
>>
>>They do as they please.
>>
>>They ignore warnings.
>>
>>They get away with it all and laugh in our faces.
>>They never did anything to warn consumers but post a little alert on their
>>little site nobody visits.
>>
>>They promised they would get Melbourne IT to send a mass warning, but
oh
>>after we learn it is not possible ( they probably don't know how such
>things
>>work, after all they're lawyers, they're not not supposed to know how
to
>>use
>>a computer ).
>>
>>The only thing we saw was Chris Disspain playing "Daddy the Hero" after
>much
>>pressure from the people that really care.
>>
>>You might say :
>>"Ginger, why don't you come yourself in the comitees smoking cigars and
>>talking shit with us ?"
>>No thank you, after a while of hanging around with you guys people might
>>think i am a scammer myself.
>>
>>Legislation is needed and the .au administration people certainly don't
>>deserve their (huge) salaries for turning an entire industry into CHAOS.
>>
>>The problem is we are ALL Australian consumers and in one respect or
>another
>>we are all affected and that is simply un acceptable.
>>
>>
>>Ginger
>>
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>>List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
>>Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
>>
>>author, further information at the above URL.  (313 subscribers.)
>>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
>Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
>author, further information at the above URL.  (314 subscribers.)
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
>Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
>
>author, further information at the above URL.  (314 subscribers.)
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
author, further information at the above URL.  (314 subscribers.)
Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:05 UTC