Re: [DNS] RE: bizcatalyst.com.au

Re: [DNS] RE: bizcatalyst.com.au

From: bw <bw§efe.com.au>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 16:05:59 +1000
No, i'm asking why the auDA made money yet the auDA have now made rules that
no one else can.

Bernard Weekes

----- Original Message -----
From: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian&#167;creative.net.au>
To: <dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au>
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: [DNS] RE: bizcatalyst.com.au


> On Fri, Sep 20, 2002, bw wrote:
> > Ethics?
> >
> > if no one can own a domain to sell or lease then why did the auctions
occur?
>
> Hm. I could have sworn I read somewhere in the auda documentation
> that as long as you continue to meet the eleigibility requirements
> you're guaranteed to renew the domain name after a 2-year licence period.
>
> Could someone verify that for me?
> If its the case, then it makes the "auction" logical (at least from the
perspective
> that you seem to be asking..)
>
>
>
> Adrian
>
> --
> Adrian Chadd "<WeBGrrL> i WAS a lesbian.....but now i love everyone :P"
> <adrian&#167;creative.net.au>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
> Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
> author, further information at the above URL.  (361 subscribers.)
>
>
Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:06 UTC