As much as it scares me to actually agree with James he is right. I find
this very relevant. Anyone who controls a reasonable number of domains
should be able to have their registrar supply them with the full details of
this at no charge.

The fact this information isn't readily available to anyone logging in
scares the hell out of me actually. What the hell has MIT done in their cms
to not have this available?

This is one of the most relevant posts James has made(if not the). They want
to charge $1500? They should be fined $150k and build a decent cms. If my
registrar pulled something like that I'd be in court with them. Mind you I
would have kept accurate records of my own business dealings. It's still
wrong though. How can they justify this charge James? Have they given some
explicit reason?

John




-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Archer [mailto:rha§juggernaut.com.au]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2003 3:27 PM
To: dns§lists.auda.org.au
Subject: Re: RE: [DNS] Release of registry information on total
ownership if individuals


At 15:18 +1000 22/7/03, jamesguy wrote:

>Already have and disagree.  It is relevant to the domain name industry.

Bullshit. It is relevant to you and to MelbourneIT. Nobody else.

 ...R.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
author, further information at the above URL.  (368 subscribers.)