Okay do I have this right then.  All staff of not for profit
organisations have no privacy rights and any details any
member of the public wishes to ask them or accuse them of
must be responded to?

Why should non for profits be held to a level far far above
companies?  If anything there should be more disclosure by
companies than your local golf club (and in fact in NZ law
anyway disclosure of salaries above $100,000 is required for
companies, but not incorporated societies).

I'm all for transparency and openness, but having people
rant on a list making allegations about salary levels and
demanding answers is rather beyond the pale.

DPF

> My understanding is that the auDA is a 'not for profit'
> organisation, ALL cards should be laid on the table.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Bernard Weekes
> E-Commerce Australia
> www.e-commerce.net.au
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <david&#167;farrar.com>
> To: <dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au>
> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 10:59 AM
> Subject: Re: [DNS] the list cops a beating
>
>
> > > I think its a great idea they answer ALL questions
> > > here, then we can all see... what is there to hide?
> >
> > Well one of Mr Guy's questions was over how much the
> > AUDA CEO gets paid.  If that is fair discussion for the
> > list, then why not ask every person on the list to post
> > their tax returns for the last three years?
> >
> > DPF
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------- -
> > List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
> http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
> > Please do not retransmit articles on this list without
> > permission of the author, further information at the
> above URL. >
> >
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------- List policy, unsubscribing and archives
> => http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/ Please do not
> retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
> author, further information at the above URL.
>
>