Dear Craig Oehlers <c.oehlers&#167;internetregistry.com.au>,

I have a slight correction to one of my comments; the subsequent access
to the Sanctum Internet web site MIGHT have come from someone else using
YOUR Internet connection (202.72.174.233) using EXACTLY the same web
browser version which YOU used to access YOUR web mail.

Once again, an excerpt from the Sanctum Internet web server logs showing
YOU clicking through to the Sanctum Internet web site from your webmail
account:

secure.sanctum.com.au/access_log_thismonth:202.72.174.233 - -
[12/Sep/2003:12:47:18 +1000] "GET /staff.htm HTTP/1.1" 304 -
"http://www.proweb.net.au:2095/craig+proweb.net.au/neomail.pl?action=rea
dmessage&firstmessage=1&sessionid=proweb-session-0.787194829274998&statu
s=&folder=&sort=date&headers=simple&message_id=cbe700203777e783d47ab1319
74f8648" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR
1.1.4322)"

The next entry shows someone using YOUR Internet connection
(202.72.174.233) using EXACTLY the same web browser version which YOU
used to access YOUR web mail attempting to register "josh-is-a-fag.com".
Were you using someone else's PC to check your web mail?  Was it Brad
Norrish?  Chesley Rafferty?  Jason Namour?  The Boogie Man?

secure.sanctum.com.au/access_log_thismonth:202.72.174.233 - -
[12/Sep/2003:14:12:24 +1000] "GET
/cgi-bin/register.cgi?domain=josh-is-a-fag.com&tracking_id=&action=elig&
ludomain=&domaintype=.com.au HTTP/1.1" 200 7247
"https://secure.sanctum.com.au/cgi-bin/register.cgi" "Mozilla/4.0
(compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)"

An off-list email to myself from Jason Namour also originated from the
IP address 202.72.174.233, here is an excerpt from Jason Namour's email
headers:

Received: from [202.72.174.233] (helo=design) by server.diverserv.com
with smtp (Exim 4.20) id 19z4UK-0002Mh-5q for josh&#167;email.nu; Mon, 15 Sep
2003 21:18:40 -0400

Brad Norrish is the registrant for diverserv.com.

There have been FOUR different web browser versions accessing Sanctum
Internet web sites from the IP address 202.72.174.233 according to
Sanctum Internet's web server logs:

- Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)
- Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
- Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; Q312461; TUCOWS;
.NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5a)
Gecko/20030728 Mozilla Firebird/0.6.1

Who are the other people who share YOUR Internet connection
(202.72.174.233)?

A Visio diagram tells a thousand words ...

http://whatsinaname.com.au/renewals/2003-09-16-dna.jpg


Josh
--
http://josh.id.au/

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Craig Oehlers
> Sent: Tuesday, 17 September 2002 7:13 
> To: dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au
> Subject: [DNS] Josh Rowe jumping the gun - yet again
> 
> 
> Thanks Josh, yet again for your pointless, childish, 
> narrow-minded "detective work" regarding something you 
> believe has to do with you.
> 
> You have defamed my name over the past week and I have kept 
> quiet. Your petty little bickering isn't worth my time but 
> when you clearly state information which is untrue about me 
> and attacks my integrity, I find it extremely offensive.
> 
> At what point did you find it was necessary to post, in 
> detail, every personal detail you could possibly find on me 
> and my business Proweb Solutions? You've even posted every 
> whitepages entry of the name "Oehlers" that you can get your 
> hands on. How does this have to do with anything and what are 
> your intentions behind doing so?
> 
> Is it an ego thing, the slight mention of anyone's name or 
> involvement in anything and you need to clog our minds with 
> your ignorance?
> 
> You state the following:
> 
> "Following this access Craig Oehlers, using the same Internet 
> connection (IP address: 202.72.174.233) and web browser, 
> attempted to register the following domain names on the 
> Sanctum Internet web site:"
> 
> Is there no flaw in your hard proven facts that maybe, it's 
> just possible, that this wasn't me? Are there any of your 
> other hard proven facts which you'd also like to rethink?
> 
> I'd be willing to sign an affidavit declaring that the 
> registrations on your website were not by me and I'm seeking 
> legal advice in regards to some of the comments you've made 
> about me and taking this matter further.
> 
> The least I'll be expecting is an immediate apology, 
> similarly to last time you jumped the gun and declared 
> NetRegistry was spamming without worrying about the full 
> story. See http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/archive/082001/0054.html
> 
> Get your facts straight Josh - you're doing yourself no favours.
> 
> 
> Craig Oehlers
> Proweb Solutions
> 
> PS: The socks are in the mail, now please do us all a favour.