] On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, David Keegel wrote:
] 
]  > ] John, when you rejected the domain name, it was automatically deleted  
]  > ] from the registry, making it available for others to register, hence  
]  > ] the blank WHOIS response.
]  > 
]  > If anyone needs to see an example of a similar id.au domain which
]  > hasn't been deleted, you can contact me privately.  The "registrant"
]  > received the email from Bottle and has neither accepted nor rejected
]  > it.  She had previously registered another id.au domain with Bottle.
] 
] So now maybe someone needs to register such an .id.au - through another
] registrar - to demonstrate that it has been cybersquatted, so that the
] appropriate action can be taken by auDA?

There's no need to do that.  auDA has already taken action (at least
in the case I know about).

___________________________________________________________________________
 David Keegel <djk&#167;cybersource.com.au>  http://www.cyber.com.au/users/djk/
 Cybersource P/L: Linux/Unix Systems Administration Consulting/Contracting