|> -----Original Message----- |> From: dns-bounces+dassa=dhs.org§dotau.org |> [mailto:dns-bounces+dassa=dhs.org§dotau.org] On Behalf Of |> Deus Ex Machina |> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 11:33 AM |> To: .au DNS Discussion List |> Subject: Re: [DNS] Cybersquatting |> |> Dassa [dassa§dhs.org] wrote: |> > I prefer the following definition: |> > Cybersquatting is the act of registering a popular Internet |> > address--usually a company name--with the intent of |> selling it to its rightful owner. |> |> there is no such thing as a "rightful" owner. two or more |> entities can have perfectly valid claims over the same name. |> I think thats where people go wrong they equate a trade |> mark, company or business name etc as a right in the name |> space. no such right exists One thing we can agree on. The only right is to use a hostname as it was intended to be used and not as a commodity. Darryl (Dassa) LynchReceived on Wed Sep 28 2005 - 10:04:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC