|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: dns-bounces+dassa=dhs.org§dotau.org 
|> [mailto:dns-bounces+dassa=dhs.org§dotau.org] On Behalf Of Dassa
|> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 9:20 PM
|> To: '.au DNS Discussion List'
|> Subject: Re: 
|> [DNS]Timefortherulestochangeregardingtransferringdomainnamelicences
|> 
|> |> -----Original Message-----
|> |> From: dns-bounces+dassa=dhs.org§dotau.org
|> |> [mailto:dns-bounces+dassa=dhs.org§dotau.org] On Behalf Of Kirk 
|> |> Fletcher
|> |> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 8:13 AM
|> |> To: .au DNS Discussion List
|> |> Subject: Re: 
|> |> 
<snip>
|> I'd suggest Bruce or others add to the proposed text for the 
|> policy so that the rest of the policy that relates to the 
|> proposed article to be replaced is also adjusted when the 
|> final proposal goes to AuDA.  There are a few articles left 
|> hanging if just 3.1 is replaced.
<snip>

Not just a few articles either, whole other policies would either need to be
abolished or altered to accomadate a change in the transfer policy that
allowed any sale of a domain name through transfer.  However, if a sale was
taken out of the equation the other policies could stand and enforce the no
secondary market rule.

I will really have to devote more time soon to going completely through the
AuDA website and catching up on everything.

Darryl (Dassa) Lynch