I suggest the following by way of set up for the domain name administration Company. 1. Name - I agree that the name should be Australian Domain Name Administration Limited ("ADNA" or "ADNAL"); 2. Objects - The objects of the Company might be to: *Administer the allocation of domain names in Australia ensuring the operation of a uniform addressing system, competition between domain name administrators *to develop an approve policies for the administration of individual domains and reducing and the management and efficient resolutions legal disputes which may arise in relation to name allocation It might also say that the company must e facilitate the creation of new domains as "reasonably required" or "in relation to is no objection on the basis of unlawfulness" - it depends how wide we want to go. 3. I propose that the founding members be intiaa, ISOC-AU and at least three other not for profit computer technology associated associations. I am not fixed in any way on this suggestion except a company limited by guarantee must have five original subscribers. Our criteria for membership might be that a member must be a not for profit industry association with specific objects dedicating it to the development and furtherance of the internet or an aspect of the internet. If looking at then objects of possible candidates they do not qualify we could bring in some commercial subscribers: who might be subscribers but non voting members. 4. I propose that the board have eight original members one from each of the organisations and up to three other nominees invited by the Board Consider for example whether we might want to invite Robert Elz on to the board even if he isnot a delegate from the relevant organisation. Obviously this would have to be handled carefully to make sure that there isn't a voting block created by the additional nominees and the organisation delegate. I suggest each director hold office for two years at which time they must be reappointed by the nominating company or by the board. 5. Capital Structure - Being a Company limited by guarantee there is no capital to be owned. However the members of the association can be structured in any way we desire. I suggest that all voting memberships be granted only to not for profit industry association bodies meeting the criteria described above. We might also create a second class of non voting member for anybody who would like to be involved in the policies, meetings and functions of the organisation for example a profit making domain name administrators. They would be entitled to receive notices, general meetings of the corporation to participate in working parties but not to vote or to appoint board members. It might be that non voting members qualify for one of the three non-membership board positions. 6. Funding I propose that the Company be empowered to fund its activities by any reasonable means. However the articles might anticipate that it will charge a licence feeto domain name administrators based on the number of domain names issued Phillips Fox is prepared to do this work on the basis that it will be paid by the Company once it is in existence. Once we have an idea of the description of the Company and the working party should settle the details of that arrangement. ___________________________________ Patrick Fair Partner, Phillips Fox Lawyers Sydney, Australia pvf§sydney.PhillipsFox.com.au ph 61 2 9286 8233 fax 61 2 92834144Received on Sun Mar 02 1997 - 20:40:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:02 UTC