Re: DNS: Points for disscussion at the meeting 16\05\97

Re: DNS: Points for disscussion at the meeting 16\05\97

From: Rick Welykochy <rick§>
Date: Tue, 13 May 1997 21:24:50 +1000 (EST)

On Tue, 13 May 1997, Nick Andrew wrote:

> I don't think so. You would like to involve everybody in your private
> feud. The DNS forum is not a forum for resolution of disputes. It isn't
> even for discussion of domain policies like that which is
> evidently following. It is all about the management of the .au namespace,
> which is not directly relevant to your problem.
> > > The trading name of the company in the registry is Weddings Online
> > > 
> > > My trading name is (Registered Number 1321533n (VIC)) I see
> > > a clear conflict here if a domain name is awarded to an opposing company
> > > in my company's registered business name.

Have I missed something here? The 2ld is for network providers.
Read the policy document available on the AUNIC Web site. Heavens knows
what a Wedding company is doing in that domain?!

Rick Welykochy
Dot Communications
Received on Tue May 13 1997 - 21:57:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:02 UTC