From: Adam Todd <at§>
Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 11:50:35 +1000
>rejected again. it seems some other part of centacare already has
> and this group wanted Mr Elz has
>decreed that this group should organise it with and
>has yet again rejected the application.
>I am I the only one here who finds this disgracefull?

Actually, I must admit I tend to lean towards Elz's decision here.

I can't see why Centacare can't use correct Sub Domain processes to create
sub domains for all their agencies - unless they are in no way related - in
which case - first come first served.

I strongly dislike people registering multiple names for different
branches.  It creates confusion to the public.  

The first attempt the public will make tryiong to find this place is - actually it will probably be followed by
then if they know what that is anyway.

What's wrong with ?  It's heirachical.

Sorry to flatten the argument but I really agree with Elz on this.

The advice offered in this email is not considered professional advice,
or it would be accompanied by an invoice. No permission is granted for 
republication of comments, without written consent.
Business Development, Technology Domain Registration and Network Advisory
Telstra Convey Member			  AURSC
Adam Todd                                 Personal  
at&#167;aus  or				   http://adam.says.sheesh
Phone +61 2 9729 0565                     Network
AU Internet News
AU Internet User Mail List
Received on Mon May 11 1998 - 13:52:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:03 UTC