On Friday, June 19, 1998 4:41 PM, Simon Hackett[SMTP:simon§internode.com.au] wrote: §Jim Fleming said (about me, in part): §> §>In my opinion, there is nothing wrong with dealing with both worlds on §>a regular basis. One simply has to understand which group they are dealing §>with. Based on your comments, I sense that you are part of the implosive §>telco-like core. That is fine, but I hope that you understand that it is not §>for everyone. That is trailing-edge. Some prefer to work at the leading edge. §> § §My comments were merely to observe that I could find no information about §"IPv8" on the web site related to the organisation who originated and are §most frequently associated with the use of a label such as "IPvn" for some §value of n, the IETF. IP version numbers are assigned by IANA. Did you get §"8" assigned to you by IANA, Jim? § Sorry...some people like to abbreviate... CATNIP version 8....or CAT 'n IP version 8 C+§-N-IPv8 Are you familiar with C+§ ? Now there is a good name for the search engines. It is a stealth name. It flys right under the radar. Just enter it into any of the major search engines and see what you come up with.... Before you tell me that does not exist...here is one pointer... http://www.ddj.com/index/author/idx10133.htm By the way, I am making the assumption that this discussion is not part of the typical exchanges that go on with the implosive groups. I am also making the assumption that you are a leading edge person and that you are following this discussion. Jim Fleming Unir Corporation - http://www.unir.com 1998 - The Year of the C+§Received on Sat Jun 20 1998 - 23:35:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:03 UTC