Thanks
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Keegel" <djk&#167;cyber.com.au>
To: <dns&#167;auda.org.au>
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 12:20 AM
Subject: Re: [DNS] Privacy


> ] Clearly I should have spent more time reading the criteria for Privacy
> ] Commission intervention - my apologies, the start-up date for complaints
> ] against private companies is in fact 21st December 2001 (I thought they
> ] commenced a few months ago - my mistake).
> ]
> ] However this is probably quite appropriate and an opportunity for us, as
it
> ] means our industry has two months grace in which to identify and rectify
all
> ] of the privacy issues - one thing the Commission does provide is an
> ] excellent framework on which to build privacy guarantees into an
industrial
> ] Code of Conduct - something that is now more than ever an obvious
necessity.
>
> Please bear in mind that the Privacy Amendment is optional for *small*
> businesses until Dec 2002.  "Small" means a business or organisation
> with annual turnover less than $3 million.  Some (like auDA) may opt-in
> to be subject to the Privacy Act anyway (as those who read the report
> of the Registrar public meeting where this was discussed would know).
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
>  David Keegel <djk&#167;cyber.com.au>  URL: http://www.cyber.com.au/users/djk/
> Cybersource P/L: Unix Systems Administration and TCP/IP network management
>
> --
> This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without
> express permission of the author. 313 subscribers.
> Archived at http://listmaster.iinet.net.au/list/dns (user: dns, pass: dns)
> Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request&#167;auda.org.au to be removed.
>
>
>