Thanks Kim

An interesting public policy issue.

On the one hand it appears that auDA and the industry wishes and
expects openess, transparency and accountability, on the other this
appears unachievable because of the risks of legal liability for auDA.

Is this a reasonable summation, or is there a better way of putting
it?

There appears to be no simple solution.


Ian Johnston

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kim Davies [mailto:kim§cynosure.com.au]
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 1:16 PM
> To: dns§lists.auda.org.au
> Subject: Re: [DNS] DNS list archive
>
>
> Quoting Ian Johnston on Monday August 12, 2002:
> |
> | Is there any particular reason why the DNS archive ceases
> at Nov 2001
> | <www.auda.org.au/list/dns/archive/>.  I may have missed earlier
> | advice.
>
> Yes. There was concern expressed that publishing the list archive
> exposes auDA to some undesirable legal liability. As a result the
> web archive updating was suspended until further notice.
> Archives are still being kept should this change in the future.
>
> kim
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/
Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of
the
author, further information at the above URL.  (357 subscribers.)