Re: [DNS] And The Winner Is!

Re: [DNS] And The Winner Is!

From: Adrian Chadd <adrian§>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 16:29:21 +0800
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002, Kim Davies wrote:
> Quoting Bottle Domains on Friday October 04, 2002:
> | 
> | In the early parts of Thursday morning we were having trouble with our  
> | automated batching of generic requests.  Some undefined timeout from  
> | our connection.  Despite multiple attempts to correct this before 11am,  
> | we were unable to do so.  As a result, to protect our generic  
> | applications, we were forced to take alternative action.  This meant  
> | that around 57 domains were registered to our parent company Australian  
> | Style Pty Ltd, on behalf of our eligible registrants.  Bottle Domains  
> | has been in discussion with auDA and Ausregistry with regards to  
> | modifying the registrant details to that of our eligible customer, and  
> | this will be processed as soon as possible.
> The fundamental question is, did you have permission to bend/break the
> rules prior to doing this?
> I don't believe rules are there just so you can break them when it is
> convenient.

Just out of curiousity - whats changing business name have to do with
"some undefined timeout from our connection" ? The scripts behaviour
changed based on the registring company? :)


Adrian Chadd			"<WeBGrrL> i WAS a lesbian.....but now i love everyone :P"
Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:06 UTC