Re: [DNS] More on the issue of reseller / registrar relationship

Re: [DNS] More on the issue of reseller / registrar relationship

From: Deus Ex Machina <vicc§>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 11:19:21 +1000
Richard Archer [rha&#167;] wrote:
> At 10:19 +1000 24/6/03, Sean Finn wrote:
> >Its the fact that they have *proven* their technical ability to run a perl
> >script.
> Well, if that's all they do (i.e. enforce the naming policy) then
> IMHO there is no place for them in the .AU hierarchy.
> This trivial task should be performed by the registry under the
> watchful eye of auDA. After all, that is the central point where
> the policy should be applied, not at the distributed registrar
> level. It makes no sense having 50 organisations applying
> policy at this level.

auda does not have the resources to police 100 registrars. each
level has to have its own value add. resellers should provide a different
value then registrars who check compliance, manage renewal dates and provide
interfaces for individuals/resellers. field numerous phone calls and are even
required to deal with non-client disputes.

how would you as a reseller like to be forced to deal with non-client disputes for free?

Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:06 UTC