Re: [DNS] Enetica

Re: [DNS] Enetica

From: Richard Keeves <richard§>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 12:34:36 +0800
To my knowledge, Enetica have *not* approached our clients directly.  Other
registrars *have* approached our clients.   We have always found Enetica
great to deal with.  What concerns me is that Enetica (and others) think it
ok to compete with their channel -  and target the same registrant client
who was introduced to them by the reseller.   that is a business practice
that is *not*  ok.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Domain Registration Services" <mail&#167;>
To: <dns&#167;>
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 11:32 AM
Subject: RE: [DNS] Enetica

> Hi Richard,
> Have Enetica or any other Registrar approached your clients with regards
> taking them on as direct customers? Or has any Registrar approached your
> clients offering them additional services?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Keeves [mailto:richard&#167;]
> Sent: Tuesday, 24 June 2003 12:48 PM
> To: dns&#167;
> Subject: Re: [DNS] Enetica
> I am **NOT**  saying that resellers should be shielded from competition.
> you to say this seriously misses the point of the discussion.  But the
> competition should not come from the registrar whose services the reseller
> is reselling.  Enetica should not be competitng head-on with Enetica's own
> resellers - especially to a registrant who was introduced to the registrar
> by that very reseller.  if that is what is what auDA is encouraging thru
> policies then it not only sux, but it is evil. and in need of change.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
> Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
> author, further information at the above URL.  (368 subscribers.)
Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:06 UTC