"Kicking up a fuss" as you put it is merely my illuminating a problem area with auDA.  

Any application I make to auDA to be included on any panel is not relevant to whether a written policy or tender system is in place.

Or perhaps you may be able to point me towards an existing written procol or policy that exists and is freely available to the public.  If I am incorrect then I withdraw my submission that this situation is untenable.

Surely the matter of whether or not I make an application would be dependent upon my meeting certain tender criteria.  If so what are those criteria and when is the next tender round.  

Assuming that such a protocol exists then I will then make any application for consideration as I see fit.  

In the mean time if you object to my raising this as an issue for discussion what are the grounds for such an objection.

Kind regards

James Guy

> On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:18:27 +1000, jamesguy
> <jamesguy&#167;guyassociates.com.au> wrote:
> 
> >I have already indicated that as a solicitor I have an interest in > tendering for any legal work from auda.
> 
> Could I suggest a far better way would be to send your professional
> credentials, areas of expertise, fees etc to the CEO of AUDA so he can
> weigh them up against AUDA's existing firms. 
> 
> I can't imagine kicking up a fuss on this list is going to help you in
> any way persuade people.
> 
> DPF
> --
> E-mail: david&#167;farrar.com
> ICQ:    29964527
> MSN:    dpf666&#167;hotmail.com