Why would he use something he got tricked into buying unless it was
obviously a good investment?

Craig

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ron Stark" <ronstark&#167;snapsite.com.au>
To: <dns&#167;dotau.org>
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 1:43 PM
Subject: RE: [DNS] 12-3 Win For Domain Name Distributors


> After 2 years of using it, he had a considerable investment in it
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brad Norrish [mailto:brad&#167;brad.com.au]
> > Sent: Friday, 30 April 2004 3:14 PM
> > To: dns&#167;dotau.org
> > Subject: Re: [DNS] 12-3 Win For Domain Name Distributors
> >
> > Ron, your "friend" spent $20 000 defending a domain that he
> > didn't even want?
> > Maybe your friend needs a friend in the domain industry.
> >
> > birds of a feather...
> >
> >
> > Brad
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ron Stark" <ronstark&#167;snapsite.com.au>
> > To: <dns&#167;dotau.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 4:07 PM
> > Subject: RE: [DNS] 12-3 Win For Domain Name Distributors
> >
> >
> > > What a coincidence!  That sounds just like a guy I know who
> > worked for a
> > > company that took out a .com in response to one of those mailouts,
> > believing
> > > he was renewing his existing domain name.
> > >
> > > Two years later they were involved in a legal dispute with
> > an overseas
> > > company who wanted the .com name that they didn't own.
> > >
> > > $20 000 later they lost the .com to the plaintiff.  If only
> > they hadn't
> > been
> > > tricked into registering that .com name and ripped off that
> > extra 100
> > bucks
> > > - they'd have saved that money, plus all the losses of
> > email, internal
> > staff
> > > time and their inefficiencies.
> > >
> > > Australia 0, USA 1.
> > >
> > > What a disgrace that some people think that sheep are only good for
> > screwing
> > > and shearing.
> > >
> > > -r-
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Brad Norrish [mailto:brad&#167;brad.com.au]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, 28 April 2004 5:50 PM
> > > > To: dns&#167;dotau.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [DNS] 12-3 Win For Domain Name Distributors
> > > >
> > > > A guy I know works for a company that had their .com.au
> > > > operational but didn't have the .com version registered. I
> > > > mentioned that they should get it, he said he wasn't involved
> > > > with that side of things.
> > > >
> > > > Two years later they were involved in a legal dispute with an
> > > > overseas company over the name and $20,000 later didn't own it.
> > > >
> > > > The service provided by the Australian domain industry did
> > > > absolutely nothing for this Australian company.
> > > >
> > > > They already had a domain
> > > >
> > > > If only they had been "ripped off" by an extra 100 bucks for
> > > > a 2 years registration!
> > > >
> > > > This cost doesn't mention their loss of email, internal staff
> > > > costs and inefficiencies.
> > > >
> > > > Australia 0 UK 1
> > > >
> > > > It's pointless to teach sheep economics, just leave them to
> > > > breed for the benefit of the eagles.
> > > >
> > > > Brad
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Discount Domain Name Services" <rod&#167;ddns.com.au>
> > > > To: <dns&#167;dotau.org>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 3:18 PM
> > > > Subject: RE: [DNS] Guilty Verdict For Au Domain Name Scammers
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Not misleading ones Jason. We offered a good deal nothing
> > > > more nothing
> > > > less.
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Jason Trickey [mailto:jason&#167;mydomain.com.au]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 4:55 PM
> > > > > To: dns&#167;dotau.org
> > > > > Subject: RE: [DNS] Guilty Verdict For Au Domain Name Scammers
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Have you forgotten you once sent out unsolicited renewal
> > > > notices yourself
> > > > > Rod?
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > >
> > > > > -j
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > At 04:48 PM 28/04/2004 +1000, Rod Keys wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >People who get into these types of scams always invest in
> > > > depreciating
> > > > > >assets.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > ------------
> > > > -
> > > > > List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
> > > > > Please do not retransmit articles on this list without
> > > > permission of the
> > > > > author, further information at the above URL.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > ------------
> > > > -
> > > > > List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
> > > > > Please do not retransmit articles on this list without
> > > > permission of the
> > > > > author, further information at the above URL.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > -------------
> > > > List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
> > > > Please do not retransmit articles on this list without
> > > > permission of the
> > > > author, further information at the above URL.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------------
> > -
> > > List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
> > > Please do not retransmit articles on this list without
> > permission of the
> > > author, further information at the above URL.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------------
> > List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
> > Please do not retransmit articles on this list without
> > permission of the
> > author, further information at the above URL.
> >
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
> Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the
> author, further information at the above URL.
>
>
>