Re: [DNS] Searcher twists name rules

Re: [DNS] Searcher twists name rules

From: ian&#167;bluedoor <auda206§>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:12:17 +1100
If the consumer has a legitimate reason for registering the domain name  
then the current policy accommodates them.
 From what you and auda are saying is that because I run a "directory"  
then I have the right to register the domain
I note that you have no trade mark for enetica so you have no  
protection there.

Perhaps we can put a challenge out there to see who can register the  
most blatant rip off, after all it is now virtually an open namespace.


On Thursday, March 24, 2005, at 09:44 AM, Deus Ex Machina wrote:

> ian&#167;bluedoor [auda206§] wrote:
>> It depends who your customers are ?
>> I thought the policy was there to protect the consumer.
> from having names they want?
> Vic
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ----
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
> Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of  
> the
> author, further information at the above URL.
Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC