Re: [DNS] Searcher twists name rules

Re: [DNS] Searcher twists name rules

From: Mike <mjr§>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 08:30:03 +1030
Hi Kim,
My point pertained to the ehics involved, and the effects the current 
.au policy may have on unwilling and/or unknowing participants, like  
the hypothetical workers for the company I referred to..

Where did I refer to anyone thinking they had a perpetual immutable 
right to a name Kim?
I'm talking about employees who worked for the hydpothetical company.
Please stay on topic Kim, dont try and confuse or obfuscate the issue 
any more than auDA already has...


My point KimKim Davies wrote:

>A domain registration is a limited license under specific terms. If
>someone thinks they have a perpetual immutable right to a domain name,
>then that is through their own stupidity. I am sure domain names aren't
>the only things in this world that are non-transferable.
>List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
>Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of the 
>author, further information at the above URL.
Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC