>>So, has anyone who was sent this email contacted auDA and passed on this evidence? Hi David Yes, I have emailed auDA to ask if they have concerns about this situation. Like many on this list, I received the email from Nic, which I haven't responded to, as any correspondence with Nic would legitimise what I believe is an action that smacks of opportunism and squatting. Members of the community raised concerns about this process (eg Margaret River) and the industry acknowledged that the ballot process was the fairest system available (which I agree with). To find out at this point in the process that there are 2 entities (see earlier thread) that have secured some of the most well-known names in the country, suggests that the process was somehow taken advantage of, despite the efforts of the industry to limit opportunities for scammers. What is worse, is that members of the industry were then contacted by unsolicited email seeking their interest in "partnering" in the development of the very domains secured in this process that was designed to be fair. MartyReceived on Sun Sep 11 2005 - 02:38:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC