>Now that auDA has (finally) caught up with reality and released the >remaining generic and geographic names that weren't registered when Mr Elz >was away on holiday back in the mid 90's, it would seem a good time to >remove another artificial (and ineffective) restriction on the development >of the .au domain name industry. The only problem with that is - whose job is it to define what is effective, and what is ineffective development of the industry? Removing the restrictions in place, in my opinion, would be counter-productive, and would only bring us closer to the free-for-all that is the US .com system. By lifting the restrictions, you only open the door to squatters and the like, which in the minds of many, would be a backwards step in many peoples' minds. Those 'restrictions' are there for a reason, and have served the industry well. Why change now? J.Received on Fri Sep 23 2005 - 08:38:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC