Kim Davies [kim§cynosure.com.au] wrote: > Quoting Ian Johnston on Friday September 23, 2005: > | > | I agree that it is time to review this policy. > | - encourage, or at least not discourage, the development of an orderly, open > | and competitive secondary market in .com.au domain name licences. > > What are the community benefits from encouraging a secondary market > (which seems like a euphemism for encouraging cybersquatting)? thats a self obvious question surely. the community benefits from being able to unlock the value in the names. currently the rules straightjacket the community. as bruce has outlined the cybersquating can be addressed other then by killing the secondary market. thats like throwing the baby out with the bath water. auda is supposed to promote the name space, not lock it up. VicReceived on Fri Sep 23 2005 - 13:03:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC