[DNS] Regarding cybersquatting

[DNS] Regarding cybersquatting

From: Michael Purse <pursey§gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 22:39:20 +1000
> As I understand it there are no obstructions to moving a domain name to a new
> holder if it is part of a business sale/transfer.  It is only questionable if
> the domain name is being sold/transferred on it's own.  I don't have any
> problem with hostnames being sold as part of a business sale, just when the
> hostname is the basis for the sale.

With that logic, you'd object to the sale of rosesonly.com.au as its
domain is its main asset.

A lot of businesses could be sold simply of the basis that they have
an excellent domain name. I don't see an issue with that.
Received on Sat Sep 24 2005 - 12:39:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC