everything you have to say is subordinated to the fact you choose not to
run under a .com.au

talking to people that are politicially and economically iliterate seems
to be the bane of my life at the moment. so I am not going to bother
wasting my time trying to educate you. your mind is closed and you have no intention of learning.

Vic

Dassa [dassa§dhs.org] wrote:
> |> -----Original Message-----
> |> From: dns-bounces+dassa=dhs.org§dotau.org 
> |> [mailto:dns-bounces+dassa=dhs.org§dotau.org] On Behalf Of 
> |> Deus Ex Machina
> |> Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2005 8:05 AM
> |> To: .au DNS Discussion List
> |> Subject: Re: [DNS] Time for the rules 
> |> tochangeregardingtransferringdomainname licences
> |> 
> |> Dassa [dassa§dhs.org] wrote:
> |> > |> 
> |> > |> simple exercise, I offer you $1m for a domain you own because I 
> |> > |> have a better use for it. how many people do you think will 
> |> > |> consider against the public interest to sell it?
> |> > |> none. you dont need empirical data to see very clearly that you 
> |> > |> dont have an case, just a bunch of personal opinions.
> |> > 
> |> > How is it to the public benefit to show that greed rules a 
> |> lot of people. 
> |> 
> |> how is it not in the public interest to allow private transactions? 
> |> its none of anyones business if two parties decide to trade 
> |> something.
> 
> Overinflated prices that are not a true indication of value are not in the
> public good.  Cybersquating is not in the public good and we have seen
> examples of that from the gTLD's.
>  
> |> its got nothing to do with "community" interest or 
> |> otherwise. you are just a closet communist.
> 
> Name calling again.  It is usually the sign there are no valid arguments to
> put forward.  Doesn't help your cause at all.
> 
> Darryl (Dassa) Lynch 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/