Fair points Ron. Scams of one form or another are inevitable. It's a matter of ensuring that there is a regime in place that minimises the risks, provides penalites, remedies and/or damages (including statutory possibly) that are potentially harsh and has real deterrent value. Ian Johnston > -----Original Message----- > From: dns-bounces+ian.johnston=infobrokers.com.au§dotau.org > [mailto:dns-bounces+ian.johnston=infobrokers.com.au§dotau.org] > On Behalf Of Ron Stark > Sent: Thursday, 29 September 2005 2:34 PM > To: '.au DNS Discussion List' > Subject: Re: [DNS] > Timefortherulestochangeregardingtransferringdomainnamelicences > > It's all very well to talk about legal protection and to provide for legal > recourse. The weakness is that an aggrieved registrant is > unlikely to have the resources to fund defence of their rights, > in which case the protection is worthless. > > As a very wise lawyer said to me (Craig - where are you??) - a patent is > only worth the amount of money I can put up to defend its violation. > > Ron Stark > > : -----Original Message----- > : From: dns-bounces+ronstark=snapsite.com.au§dotau.org > : [mailto:dns-bounces+ronstark=snapsite.com.au§dotau.org] On > : Behalf Of Ian Johnston > : Sent: Thursday, 29 September 2005 2:26 PM > : To: .au DNS Discussion List > : Subject: Re: [DNS] Time > : fortherulestochangeregardingtransferringdomainnamelicences > : > : Tony Owen wrote: > : > Personally, I think a transfer fee (picking a random > : number ... > $50) > : would > : > stop a whole heap of these scams, and the revenue could be used to > : > reduce the cost of the base registration fee. > : > : In an *efficent* secondary market, transaction costs should > : be as low as possible, cost-based (auDA and/or Registrar > : transfer fee) and determined by competing market > : participants (eg Registrars). Registrars may bundle > : different levels of marketing services with transfer services. > : > : Scams are probably best dealt with by other measures, > : desirably put in place by auDA, but if need be by the > : co-regulator (ACCC) and/or specific Federal legislation with > : provision for penalties. > : > : Ian JohnstonReceived on Thu Sep 29 2005 - 05:58:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC