[DNS] Domain dispute heats up

[DNS] Domain dispute heats up

From: Marty Drill - Domain Candy <marty§domaincandy.com.au>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 13:39:10 +1000
There is another question. Is it good for the Australian Internet? I.e.

Demand does not always equate to benefits to the end user. 

I agree the debate needs to be had, the starting point is to identify why
the demand exists, backed by solid information.


-----Original Message-----
From: dns-bounces+marty=domaincandy.com.au&#167;dotau.org
[mailto:dns-bounces+marty=domaincandy.com.au&#167;dotau.org] On Behalf Of Vic
Sent: Thursday, 8 June 2006 1:33 PM
To: .au DNS Discussion List
Subject: Re: [DNS] Domain dispute heats up

Ron Stark [ronstark&#167;snapsite.com.au] wrote:
> My two penn'th -  if you're going to ascertain whether a new product 
> (in this case a .au domain name) should be launched, it's no good 
> asking those select few who may / would prosper by its introduction, to
whit registrars.
> The only valid test is to ask those who would be asked to pay for it, 
> to whit registrants.  If it's going to add value to custoners, go for 
> it.  If its primary purpose is to give registrars another revenue stream,
forget it.

rubish. policy as we have been told is indiferent to registrars losses or

the only question to ask: is there a demand or not?


List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
Received on Thu Jun 08 2006 - 03:39:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC