Jason Backshall wrote:
> At the end of the day though, if you don't meet the criteria to
> apply as the registrant for the use of the my.id.au domain, then why
> should you able to maintain the use of it? If there was a grey area here
> I would have a greater appreciation for where you're coming from, but
> there isn't. It's pretty black and white.

I have to agree - there doesn't seem to be any relationship between 
Peter and my.id.au.
Although, 48 hours (at most) for an individual to mount a defence 
against an unspecified review does seem a little short.
What if he'd been on holidays?
Whether or not this case has any merit, it must be treated properly.

Lea