I have updated www.peterbaker.id.au (and deleted my personal views from the argument) basically the latest is that auda has ordered my.id.au to be deleted. On 6/26/06, Lea de Groot <dotau.org§elysiansystems.com> wrote: > > Jason Backshall wrote: > > At the end of the day though, if you don't meet the criteria to > > apply as the registrant for the use of the my.id.au domain, then why > > should you able to maintain the use of it? If there was a grey area here > > I would have a greater appreciation for where you're coming from, but > > there isn't. It's pretty black and white. > > I have to agree - there doesn't seem to be any relationship between > Peter and my.id.au. > Although, 48 hours (at most) for an individual to mount a defence > against an unspecified review does seem a little short. > What if he'd been on holidays? > Whether or not this case has any merit, it must be treated properly. > > Lea > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/ > -- www.peterbaker.id.au -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.cynosure.com.au/mailman/private/dns/attachments/20060626/fc9483a1/attachment-0001.htmReceived on Mon Jun 26 2006 - 12:01:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC