hey guys

if you read the policy at the end of the policy document link you will find
that the rules regarding .id.au namespace is not black and white.  its grey

auda has said that they plan to release 2 letter domain names "at normal
registry prices, under normal policy rules on a first come first served
basis"  I think what they are doing here is extraordinary

peter

On 6/26/06, Peter baker <jellyware&#167;gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have updated www.peterbaker.id.au (and deleted my personal views from
> the argument)
>
> basically the latest is that auda has ordered my.id.au to be deleted.
>
>
> On 6/26/06, Lea de Groot <dotau.org&#167;elysiansystems.com> wrote:
> >
> > Jason Backshall wrote:
> > > At the end of the day though, if you don't meet the criteria to
> > > apply as the registrant for the use of the my.id.au domain, then why
> > > should you able to maintain the use of it? If there was a grey area
> > here
> > > I would have a greater appreciation for where you're coming from, but
> > > there isn't. It's pretty black and white.
> >
> > I have to agree - there doesn't seem to be any relationship between
> > Peter and my.id.au.
> > Although, 48 hours (at most) for an individual to mount a defence
> > against an unspecified review does seem a little short.
> > What if he'd been on holidays?
> > Whether or not this case has any merit, it must be treated properly.
> >
> > Lea
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> www.peterbaker.id.au
>



-- 
www.peterbaker.id.au
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.cynosure.com.au/mailman/private/dns/attachments/20060627/d92ade76/attachment.htm