[DNS] Secondary Market

[DNS] Secondary Market

From: Darryl <dassa§dhs.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 07:27:54 +1000
|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: dns-bounces+dassa=dhs.org&#167;dotau.org 
|> [mailto:dns-bounces+dassa=dhs.org&#167;dotau.org] On Behalf Of Vic Cinc
|> Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 9:37 AM
|> To: .au DNS Discussion List
|> Subject: Re: [DNS] Secondary Market
|> ----- Original Message -----
|> From: "Darryl (Dassa) Lynch" <dassa&#167;dhs.org>
|> To: "'.au DNS Discussion List'" <dns&#167;dotau.org>
|> Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2006 8:56 PM
|> Subject: Re: [DNS] Secondary Market
|> >
|> > |> -----Original Message-----
|> > |> From: dns-bounces+dassa=dhs.org&#167;dotau.org
|> > |> [mailto:dns-bounces+dassa=dhs.org&#167;dotau.org] On Behalf Of
|> > |> Charlie McCormack
|> > |> Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2006 6:58 PM
|> > |> To: '.au DNS Discussion List'
|> > |> Subject: Re: [DNS] Secondary Market
|> > |>
|> > |> > You can read this as to say, No, there are other domain spaces which
|> > |> > don't have secondary markets allowed in their policies and that some
|> > |> > people disregard the .au policies as they see a secondary market as
|> > |> > means of developing their personal finances.
|> > |>
|> > |> Oh yeah god forbid anyone in this industry making a profit.
|> >
|> > Nothing wrong with making a profit, but exploiting markets and doing the 
|> > wrong thing isn't the best way to do so.
|> >
|> and of course like all good lefties, they think they are uniquely
|> to determine what is "wrong" and "right". of course they fall back to mob 
|> rule when you question there attempts to stiffle freedom. thats mob rule 
|> where the majority can vote in theft, killing and arbitrary
|> destruction simply because there is more of them under the rubric of

I sincerely wish your posts were easier to understand Vic, it is very
difficult to follow your thinking with your writing style.  I'm not trying to
say I know best.  But I am attempting to put my views forward and debating
them and others.  My opinions and views are not set in stone, I'm always
willing to consider the opinions of others but I will not just accept
something because you or someone else puts it forward.

|> > |> There are a couple of ways to get around this moronic rule,
|> > |> such as leasing the domain name to another party, or just
|> > |> register another business name and transfer it when you sell
|> > |> the business for the value of the domain name.
|> >
|> > You sound as if you are proud you are breaking the rules or the spirit of

|> > the rules.  It is people such as yourself that make restrictions
necessary.  If
|> > everyone could be counted on to do the right thing there wouldn't be a
|> and again lefties seem to like to think they know best about what is right 
|> and wrong. as though "right thing" was written in stone somewhere.

I don't know what lefties may think but I do know I won't just accept what you
or anyone else may put forward without due consideration.

|> lefties are generally selfish self indulgent know it alls that have no 
|> respect for people and fairness.

Really Vic, you should know better than to put forward such generalisations.

|> > > |> I have done this in the past and still do it today, and
|> > |> there is nothing going to stop me, period. Simply because
|> > |> there are 'real world' laws that prevent one entity from
|> > |> restricting another entity in this fashion.
|> >
|> > I assure you, if you continue to break rules and flaunt regulations then 
|> > you will be taken to task over it at some point.  Personally, I'd make a
|> > of never dealing with any company you are associated with and making sure

|> > people I know will not deal with you.
|> way to go dazza, lets boycott all capitalists. maybe charlie should put up
|> page informing people that they shouldnt deal with you to see how you like 
|> it.

He can do so if he wishes, as he is so keen on putting forward the word
defamation, he would be well advised to make sure such a page didn't defame.

For someone who is always touting business freedoms you seem to have some sort
of objection to a basic business freedom, deciding who you will do business
with.  Are you saying people should be forced to do business with anyone
despite their personal opinions?

|> > |> One thing I'd like to know, why has no registrar ever
|> > |> challenged auDA only appointing 1 registry operator?
|> > |>
|> > |> I have only ever really seen one registrar in this industry
|> > |> with any sort of balls making waves.
|> > |>
|> > |> > The policy helps to keep the name space available as intended.
|> the policy keeps the name space idle and unused. its massively inefficient 
|> system with little merit. its a complete and utter faillure  designed to
|> self indulgent lefties content with the feeling of having stiffled fair
|> yet again. or pretending what a great thing they have done with mutual back

|> slaping and congratulations.

The namespace is growing at a reasonable pace.  There you go again with the
lefties comments.  Do you think everyone who disagrees with you is a lefty and
has all these traits you keep trotting out?  Mustn't be many people around who
aren't lefties in your opinion. 

|> there is not a single thing of merit in the rules other then the massaging 
|> the egos of latter day communists.

Lefties and communists, keep looking under the bed Vic.  Never know when they
might try and sneak out.

Darryl (Dassa) Lynch 
Received on Sun Jul 16 2006 - 21:27:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC