[DNS] *.com.au & *.au.com.au

[DNS] *.com.au & *.au.com.au

From: Anand Kumria <wildfire§progsoc.uts.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 03:55:18 +1000
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 05:38:40PM +0000, Kim Davies wrote:
> Quoting Anand Kumria on Tuesday July 25, 2006:
> | If I am not mistaken you should be able to neutralise this on the Unix
> | DNS side by specifiying the zones in question to be "delegation-only".
> | Another way to do this would be to setup the zones ccTLD.com.au and
> | GTLD.com.au yourself and always return NXDOMAIN.
> I'm not sure, oh say, travel.com.au would be happy with their domain
> being quashed by virtue of a gTLD introduced 10 years after they
> registered their domain.
> One problem is that the set of TLDs is not static, but with a two letter
> prohibition at least captures all possible ISO-3166-1 alpha-2 codes.

Hmm, I had not thought of that one. However established TLDs like
.net (net.com.au) , .com (com.com.au), should not be able to be registered.

That being said, part of the problem here is the allowed discrepency
between a legal name (The Travel Specialists P/L) and the DNS name

In some respects it'd be nicer if ASIC and the various state agencies
automagically assigned entities that registered with them with an
appropriate DNS name. But I think that is a broader discussion to have
some other time.

> The real solution is that resolvers the _preference_ .au.com.au over .au
> are broken and should be fixed. Blocking otherwise legal domains is just
> applying a crude hack to patch up another hack. Just get rid of the root
> cause.

Yes, I agree searchlists are broken. 


 `When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to
  its subjects, "This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are
  forbidden to know," the end result is tyranny and oppression no matter how
  holy the motives' -- Robert A Heinlein, "If this goes on --"
Received on Mon Jul 24 2006 - 17:55:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC