[DNS] Licence Period

[DNS] Licence Period

From: Bennett Oprysa <bennett§enetica.com.au>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:07:01 +1000
> I think if AUDA is getting reviewed, It would be good to point out that we 
> need to avoid the problems that are caused by "evil registrars' in the .com 

what problems are these exactly? the fact we allow people to register 
available domain names? how dare we even think of such acts?

> My personal opinion is that Registrars should not be allowed to speculate

show me ONE .au registrar that does this, I bet you can't. I'm also 
willing to bet it won't stop you from complaining about it anyway...


> the domain market, it's kinda like putting the fox in the henhouse.
> Cheers Tony
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bennett Oprysa" <bennett&#167;enetica.com.au>
> To: ".au DNS Discussion List" <dns&#167;dotau.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 5:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [DNS] Licence Period
>>Tony Owen wrote:
>>>Do registrars have an unfair advantage when speculating on dropped names?
>>>If so, why are they allowed this advantage?
>>That's like saying 'why do registars get direct access to the registry?'
>>Why shouldn't we?
>>Anyway, whether you like it or not, I'm not going to tell you how it's
>>done, you'll just have to stay up at night panicing over the possibility
>>that the evil registrars might have access to something you don't.
>>As far as Enetica is concerned, we do not register domains from the drop
>>list for ourselves unless they are specifically applicable to us and our
>>services. The drop list is there for our customers. Registrar's
>>activities are also restricted by 'frontrunning' clauses in our auDA
>>List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/ 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
Received on Thu Aug 17 2006 - 08:07:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC