Adrian Chadd [adrian§creative.net.au] wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2006, Kirk Fletcher wrote:
> 
> > I mentioned in my first email, that most websites would probably
> > want to increase their audience as much as possible, provided that
> > the benefit outweighted the cost.  It might seem noble to suggest
> > that it should be implemented "regardless of cost" - but it isn't
> > very practical.
> 
> Thats why these sorts of things are legislated - disabilities
> aren't about "cost".

absolute rubish.

> > > And yes Kirk, I am saying it?s unacceptable, and hopefully
> > > illegal, to discriminate against someone because of a whole
> > > range of issues, including disabilities.
> > 
> > I think where we differ, David, is in our concept of discrimination.
> 
> And, again, that particular issue - the differing of the concept
> of 'discrimiation' - is why these things end up being legislated.
> You can't leave it to people to self-regulate on this matter because
> (a) its not a question of economics, its a question of social
> responsbility

social responsible starts with my kids first and you last. 

Vic