[DNS] Bottle breaches policy

[DNS] Bottle breaches policy

From: Kim Davies <kim§cynosure.com.au>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:29:47 -0700
Quoting Larry Bloch on Tuesday May 12, 2009:
| I'm on Bottle's side on this because it is bullying tactics, its arbitrary,
| and it could be any one of us next. I'm not standing up for the rights of
| downtrodden registrars, I'm standing for the right of my business to not be
| threatened by de-accreditation (and ensuing oblivion) over a matter that
| doesn't warrant it. I'm pretty bemused as to why I'm the only one. Surely
| you don't want a regulator that destroys businesses and employment with
| little notice for questionable reasons just because it can.

Apparently the Victorian Supreme Court thinks it was warranted.
"[Bottle] demonstrated an extraordinary indifference to the effect of
credit card fraud upon its victims." I am no lawyer but that sounds like
pretty strong language.


Received on Tue Sep 29 2009 - 15:29:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:10 UTC