Re: DNS: ADNA's first decisions - Minuted

Re: DNS: ADNA's first decisions - Minuted

From: Leni Mayo <leni§ais.com.au>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 11:53:14 +1000
Geoff Huston wrote:
> I must admit that after much thought about this I wonder about the
> wisdom of using an external citation as the reference of 'validity'
> of a DNS name.

A stated intent on a DNAs part to implement a mapping between the DNS
and an external citation authority might have a bit of legal risk too.

Network Solutions have a FCFS policy and haven't yet had to pay any
damages as a result of disputes between trademark owners and domain name
holders and though they've been named in a number of lawsuits, they've
mostly been dismissed as a party.

One wouldn't look to Network Solutions for pointers on allocation
management though.  They've spawned a whole industry which we can well
do without.  When someone has thousands of domain names, one would think
they were hoarding.  But from an earlier posting:
mark.hughes&#167;ccamatil.com wrote:
> For example, my company has one company
> name but thousands of products and many trademark brand names.

It'd be nice to discourage the hoarder, but if DNAs are to avoid
referring back to a citation authority, how is the hoarder different
from the bulk trademark owner?  And a fair DNA would have to charge both
of them the same price...

Leni.
Received on Fri Jul 11 1997 - 13:32:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:02 UTC