At 10:01 4/08/97 +0800, you wrote:
>
>> Actually I tend to think the opposite, let's just stick to the criteria for
>> the commercial domains which will be ADNA's initial focus. We don't know
>> what other kinds of domains (if any) ADNA will take over but obviously the
>> issues would many and varied and now is not the time to tackle them.
>
>Then I'd tend to agree with David's suggestion.  Let's
>be blunt and label them specifically "COM.AU Criteria".
>Its easy to add "and OTHERCOMMERCIALTHING.AU" later.
>
>MM
>

OK - I don't recollect David's suggestion but I am happy to declare that
what we are working on here to be the "Selection criteria for new DNA and
2LDs for commercial domains".

I would also suggest that we can now progress on the basis that *all* such
new DNAs will deal with *all* the initial ADNA 2LDs be they existing or new
as they (the domains) will all be commercially based.

Any objections?


Regards

--
Kevin Dinn ____________________    o    _          _--_|\    ZIP P/L 
Business Manager              /____|___|_)________/______\_____________
www.zip.com.au                         | .        \_.--._/  Virtually
Phone: (Australia) 02 92 704 777  Fax: 92 475 276       v  the best :-)
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
(soon to be ex) President - Australian Internet Alliance (www.aia.asn.au)
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...