RE: [DNS] ABC: Australia supports global cyber-squatting regulat ions

RE: [DNS] ABC: Australia supports global cyber-squatting regulat ions

From: WestNet Domains <domains§>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 13:07:13 +0800
Perhaps a fee per domain.

Another option may be first in best set, as like .com domains.
eg. followed by

I agree the is a good format, but the same problem may lie where
as once freggbloggs&#167;, freggbloggs§ and so on have been
used, where do we go from there.

We may as well use something like a numbering system.

Just a thought.

Ty Johnson
Technical Department
WestNet - WA's Statewide Internet Provider
Phone: 92182600 - Fax: 92182666

-----Original Message-----
From: Geoff Huston [mailto:gih&#167;]
Sent: Monday, 31 January 2000 12:34
To: dns&#167;
Subject: Re: [DNS] ABC: Australia supports global cyber-squatting

>Maybe the Australian flora and fauna turn people off.

Maybe they do, but they fill an essential role of adding a level of
which in itself has no semantic connotations.

That way I can be and you can be without
either of us feeling that one  name hierarchy or the other is
in some fashion or other. It was a damn clever move if you ask me.


This article is not to be reproduced or quoted beyond this forum without
express permission of the author.  You don't know who really wrote it.
273 subscribers. Archived at (dns/dns)
Email "unsubscribe" to dns-request&#167; to be removed.
Received on Mon Jan 31 2000 - 13:07:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:03 UTC