Re: [DNS] List of Registrars Supporting Their Channels

Re: [DNS] List of Registrars Supporting Their Channels

From: Deus Ex Machina <vicc§cia.com.au>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 16:44:19 +1000
Richard Keeves [richard&#167;ibc.com.au] wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Lucian Daniel Kafka" <luci&#167;conexim.com.au>
> > Which AU registrars have done the wrong thing by their channels and how? I
> > am interested in actual cases not theoretical scenarios.
> >
> >
> 
> 
> Rather than playing the game of naming the bad ones, let's play the game
> where Registrars come out and specify that they will support their channel -
> and that they will not target their reseller's clients directly.


dont be coy, if you know of a case, out them and spare other resellers the same drama.

> A far more valuable game right now - esp to resellers.
> 
> Correct me if I am wrong here guys, but here it is as i see it from the last
> few days
> 
> Enetica:     think it is ok to go direct
> Explorer:   say they won't go direct, but doubts have been raised on list.
> Melb IT:     who knows?  they allow accidents to happen...
> Intaserve:   tick.   say they won't go direct.

not correct.

Vic
Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Apr 27 2015 - 00:00:13 UTC