RE: [DNS] details supplied was: [DNS] Enetica problems, anyone?

RE: [DNS] details supplied was: [DNS] Enetica problems, anyone?

From: Robert Gregory <Robert.Gregory§maddocks.com.au>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:36:49 +1000
Hi all,
 
Reading auDA's current Published Policy on this may assist to inform
any discussion:
http://www.auda.org.au/docs/auda-2002-14.pdf
 
Regards
Rob Gregory
Senior Associate
Maddocks

>>> sean&#167;teknol.com.au 24/09/03 11:05:53 >>> 
I beleive it is on-topic. 

It is an ongoing issue, constantly being brought up, and quite possibly
THE 
most on-topic issue that we have had on here in months that has
required 
continued input, and discussion. 

The issue of an IT contractor being told to just 'do everything' I.T.
is a 
real scenario. 

Perhaps the extra contact fields, E.G. the Tech Contact, and the
Billing 
contact, need to undergo some real use rather than the current scenario

where they are widely misunderstood in practise. 

Im still formulating my opinion, I will suggest something more concrete

shortly, and only to this list for discussion and opinion, and if an 
individual with authority or weight beleives it is a good idea, they
can 
pick up the ball and run with it. 

Does anyone have any suggestions for how all of the contact fields can
be 
put to use equally. E.G. Give all fields some real weight and distinct

purpose, and public accessibility? 

Anyway, i need to go off and research my opinion in my lunch break, but
the 
fact that there are still constant problems and complaints and excess 
red-tape suggest that something can be done to refine the management of
.au 
on an individual domain basis, without breaking anything, but making it
just 
a little more fluid to use, time efficient, yet still as safe as the
current 
policies AuDA has put in place. 

-Sean. 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Anand Kumria [ mailto:wildfire&#167;progsoc.uts.edu.au] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 3:32 PM 
To: dns&#167;lists.auda.org.au 
Subject: Re: [DNS] details supplied was: [DNS] Enetica problems,
anyone? 


On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 03:19:19PM +1000, Bennett Oprysa wrote: 
> If you have power of attorney for a person, can you go down to the
RTA 
> and get their driver's licence for them? 

There is such a thing as 'limited power of attorney'. For example if
you 
want someone else to have control of you account the Commonwealth Bank

will ask you to execute one of those. 

Anyway this is somewhat off-topic. 

Anand 

-- 
`` We are shaped by our thoughts, we become what we think. 
When the mind is pure, joy follows like a shadow that never 
leaves. '' -- Buddha, The Dhammapada 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/ 
Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of
the 
author, further information at the above URL. 




---------------------------------------------------------------------------

List policy, unsubscribing and archives =>
http://www.auda.org.au/list/dns/ 
Please do not retransmit articles on this list without permission of
the 
author, further information at the above URL. 




----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maddocks
Melbourne - Tel: (61 3) 9288 0555  Fax: (61 3) 9288 0666   
Sydney - Tel: (61 2) 8223 4100  Fax: (61 2) 9221 0872
Web: http://www.maddocks.com.au 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The information in this electronic mail is privileged
and confidential, intended only for use of the individual
or entity named.  If you are not the intended recipient,
any dissemination, copying or use of the information is
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this transmission
in error please delete it immediately from your system
and inform us by email on info&#167;maddocks.com.au.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 00:00:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:07 UTC