[DNS] Time for the rules to change regarding transferringdomainname licences

From: Larry Bloch <larry.bloch§netregistry.com.au> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:36:40 +1000 · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Sep 09 2017 - 22:00:08 UTC

...and to press that point, NetRegistry agrees with this perspective
entirely - driven by our customers frustrations and rejection of rules that
serve mostly to frustrate them needlessly. So really, we're talking about a
very clear majority of players able to represent the buying public's mind on
the matter.

Larry

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dns-bounces+larry.bloch=netregistry.com.au&#167;dotau.org 
> [mailto:dns-bounces+larry.bloch=netregistry.com.au&#167;dotau.org] 
> On Behalf Of Deus Ex Machina
> Sent: Friday, 23 September 2005 11:19
> To: .au DNS Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [DNS] Time for the rules to change regarding 
> transferringdomainname licences
> 
> 
> Kim Davies [kim&#167;cynosure.com.au] wrote:
> > 
> > For me, transfers should be as easy as can be. However that 
> needs to 
> > be weighed against potential outcomes that could be against 
> the public 
> > interest.
> 
> and precisely what claim do you have to know the mind of the public?
> 
> you are free to express your opinion but please dont talk 
> about public interest as though you have any real exposure to it.
> 
> since betwen me and bruce represent about half the name space 
> I think we have a far clearer idea of what the public interest is.
> 
> Vic
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
> List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/
> 