Wow. You have singularly failed to address a single point of your
indictment against me -- that I am not eligible to hold cynosure.com.au.
Not that I should expect anything less.

I'll await auDA's investigations of your formal complaint.

kim

Quoting Vic Cinc on Friday June 09, 2006:
| Kim Davies [kim§cynosure.com.au] wrote:
| > Quoting Vic Cinc on Friday June 09, 2006:
| > | 
| > | Kim Davies [kim§cynosure.com.au] wrote:
| > | .........................^^^^^^
| > | well well well look at this another self appointed pontificator whos
| > | action follow what I say but whose own mind doubts his own actions.
| > | you dont qualify for a .com.au why do you still have one?
| > 
| > When I registered cynosure.com.au it was a valid under the rules
| > of .com.au, and it was grandfathered under successive policy
| > alterations (as were other people's domains).
| > 
| > So, now we know you don't support grandfathering of domains under new
| > policies.
| 
| dont put words in my mouth. the existing rules are what need to go.
| 
| > | cynosure.com.au is not listed with a magic number, there is no business
| > | activity on the web page. you are in breach of the very rules you are
| > | arguing for.
| > 
| > Prove it.
| 
| thats exatly right, nobody can, can they?  whats the point of a rule
| that says you have to have a magic number, when nobody can prove if you
| actually trading on it or not?
| 
| there is certainly nothing on your web page to indicate you are trading.
| 
| from your defensive reaction, its also clear you are not interested in
| loosing the name. nor should you have to just because you stop trading
| with it.
| 
| 
| > Oh, cia.com.au is not listed with a magic number either, are you going
| > to abolish that domain too?
| 
| it has an abn and was registered under the same rules. stupid pointless rules.
| 
| Vic
| 
| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| List policy, unsubscribing and archives => http://dotau.org/