>> Now, Jeff, perhaps you can explain in BRIEF terms what the MOUvement was
>> about, and why ADNA in itself is so much like it.  And why it in the end
>> failed and fell so flat on it's face costing innocent people tens of
>> thousands of dollars.
>
>  Well it is all in the E-mail archives on the IAHC site, those archives that
>still remain that is.  Recently some gaps have showen up.  Hummmmm?

Sounds a bit like ADNA.  "We are speaking to ISOC-AU" then it's "Ok the
minutes have been edit to reflect the truth."

Talk about X-Files :)

>> Jeff, you'll notice from the Draft documents on the ADNA web site that the
>> fees and process to become a Registrar under ADNA (which has as much
>> authority over any portion of the DNS as does the IAHC) is very similar to
>> the IAHC documents, plus or minus a few changes.
>
>  I havn't compleated my review as of yet.  But thus far the similarity is
>indeed amazing thus far.

I thought you'd find it interesting.  I miht prompt Karl to enter as well.  

>> You will also notice after reading the archives that the ADNA process was
>> "closed" meetings and of course no public non membership input.
>
>  Yes I have.  Not a good policy.  Won't stand up in the marketplace long.

It hasn't anyway.